CAD Forum - Database of tips, tricks and utilities for AutoCAD, Inventor and other Autodesk products [www.cadforum.cz]
CZ | EN | DE
Login or
registration
  Visitors: 89
RSS channel - CAD tips RSS tips
RSS discussions

Discussion Discussion forum

 

HelpCAD discussion

 
CAD Forum - Homepage CAD discussion forum - ask any CAD-related questions here, share your CAD knowledge on AutoCAD, Inventor, Revit and other Autodesk software with your peers from all over the world. To start a new topic, choose an appropriate forum.

Please abide by the rules of this forum.

How to post questions: register or login, go to the specific forum and click the NEW TOPIC button.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedNorelco: Newer but not better?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
AliveInTheLab View Drop Down
RSS robots
RSS robots


Joined: 20.Nov.2009
Status: Offline
Points: 425
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Norelco: Newer but not better?
    Posted: 29.Nov.2016 at 04:00

Norelco may be an Autodesk customer. So perhaps I am biting the hand feeds me? But here goes: Newer is not better!

I have been using an electric shaver for the last 20 years. I have been through a few of them. The one I have now is several years old:

Old

Figuring that blades have dulled over time, I thought I would replace them. So I searched for them via the web and found a replacement.

Amazon

They attached to my new razor just fine:

New

I have been using the replacement blades for a short while. My problem is that newer is not better in more than one way.

The new ones are harder to clean. Note how the old blades can be easily rinsed by simply flipping open the head.

Old_clean

The new one requires that the head be removed, rinsed, and carefully snapped back into place.

New_clean

Cleaning aside, the real problem is that the new blades do not shave as closely. Here I am before shaving (This is about 5:00 am).

Before_shaving

As an experiment, I shaved one side of my face with the old blades (left) and the other side of my face (right) with the new blades. In the morning, both sides looked about the same.

After_shaving1

However, at the end of the work day, clearly the old blades had shaven closer. Here I am at the end of the day (This is about 5:00 pm).

After_hours

You can see more stumble on the side shaven with the new blades. Since the purpose of a razor is to shave, the new blades are not better. I have tried this experiment four times, alternating face sides. I am only blogging about it once.

In doing some research for this blog article, I found one reviewer who noted:

Philips Consumer Lifestyle (U.S. vendor for Norelco shavers) should continue to make BOTH the original RQ12/52 and their newer head RQ12+ (or RQ12/62) available for users of SensoTouch 3D.

Many careful users of the superbly made SensoTouch 3D top-of-the-line 1290x find that the original RQ12/52 head GLIDES MORE SMOOTHLY (especially over sensitive neck areas) and has LESS PULLING or TUGGING than the new replacement head. I have carefully evaluated both heads on the 1290x, and that is also my conclusion.

Also note that the original RQ12/52 had THREE tracks in each of the three circular heads (including the tiny holes in the center track for stubble). The new RQ12+ has only TWO tracks in each of the three circular heads, including the new V-channel outer track. There is no inner track of tiny holes for stubble.

Side_by_side

I wonder if Norelco uses Fusion 360 to design their razors?

Visit_the_fusion_360_site

Fusion 360 combines parametric and direct modeling with analysis and simulation in the same environment. Norelco could design the blades and then run a simulation to reveal that "Hey, this won't shave Scott's face as closely." :-)

Lamenting the opposite of progress in product design is alive in the lab.

Go to the original post...

It's Alive in ihe Lab - Autodesk Labs blog by Scott Sheppard
Back to Top

Related CAD tips:


 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0,402 seconds.