CAD Forum - tips, tricks, discussion and utilities for AutoCAD, Inventor, Revit and other Autodesk products [www.cadforum.cz] ARKANCE | CONTACT - CZ | SK | EN | DE
Over 1.096.000 registered users (EN+CZ). AutoCAD tips, Inventor tips, Revit tips. Try the new precise Engineering calculator and the updated Barcode generator. New AutoCAD 2026 commands and variables.
RSS channel - CAD tips RSS tips
RSS discussions

Discussion Discussion forum

?
CAD discussions, advices, exchange of experience

CAD Forum - Homepage CAD discussion forum - ask any CAD-related questions here, share your CAD knowledge on AutoCAD, Inventor, Revit and other Autodesk software with your peers from all over the world. To start a new topic, choose an appropriate forum.

Please abide by the rules of this forum.
This is a peer-to-peer forum. The forum doesn't replace the official direct technical support provided by ARKANCE for its customers.
How to post questions: register or login, go to the specific forum and click the NEW TOPIC button.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedPublish To PDF - Speed between two similar PCs

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
thepluck View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 20.Oct.2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Publish To PDF - Speed between two similar PCs
    Posted: 24.Nov.2008 at 17:50
I have two laptops - one Dell Latitude D820, one Dell Inspiron E1705.

Inspiron runs AutoCAD Architectural Desktop 2006, Latitude runs AutoCAD 2006. 

Both computers can successfully plot and publish, but the Inspiron completes the task three times faster than the Latitude, and they have very similar settings in AutoCAD!  (For my speed test, I used the same AutoCAD file on both computers).

The funny thing is, the Latitude has 3.25 GB of ram, and a faster processor (it's a newer computer).  The Inspiron has 2 GB of ram, and is older.

Does anyone know of settings or system variables in AutoCAD that could affect the speed at which plotting/publishing is completed?

the other option, I suppose, is that Architectural Desktop is just better at plotting/publishing...

Thanks!


Corey Plucker
Project Engineer &
Acoustical Consultant
Stangl Associates
PO Box 321
Amherst, MA 01004
Phone: (413) 549-6200
Fax: (413) 259-4588

Back to Top
rossassociates View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 20.Oct.2008
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 79
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25.Nov.2008 at 11:51
Same OSes?

Same DWG?

Defrag both, plus use ccleaner to clean things up...

Check the CPU usage of both and memory usage..

Thinking about it, it might be the HDD in them or the graphics card/setting that makes a difference..  Check the HDDs (ideally spin rate and cache size), then check the graphics cards in both.  If they're built-in, maybe check the BIOS to give extra RAM to the graphics cards, for memory...

What's the difference in speed are we talking one second, a few, or a lot longer?  Are the drawing files the same ones, or comparable in size?

Back to Top
thepluck View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 20.Oct.2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25.Nov.2008 at 14:34
Yes, Same OSes, Same DWG.

For a relatively large AutoCAD file, the Inspiron takes maybe 10-15 seconds to plot a drawing completely.  The Latitude takes more like 1 minute per drawing.

I had not thought of it being a Hard Drive or graphics card issue, I will look at that - so, you don't believe there's any particular setting or system variable in AutoCAD that might control the speed of plotting?

For instance - it doesn't seem to matter whether I'm background plotting/publishing or not.  Both computers use the exact same RGB file to plot the drawing, same size output, DPI, etc.

Corey Plucker
Project Engineer &
Acoustical Consultant
Stangl Associates
PO Box 321
Amherst, MA 01004
Phone: (413) 549-6200
Fax: (413) 259-4588

Back to Top

Related CAD tips:


 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0,242 seconds.