CAD Forum - tips, tricks, discussion and utilities for AutoCAD, Inventor, Revit and other Autodesk products [www.cadforum.cz] ARKANCE | CONTACT - CZ | SK | EN | DE
Over 1.091.000 registered users (EN+CZ). AutoCAD tips, Inventor tips, Revit tips. Try the new precise Engineering calculator. New AutoCAD 2026 commands and variables.
RSS channel - CAD tips RSS tips
RSS discussions

Discussion Discussion forum

?
CAD discussions, advices, exchange of experience

CAD Forum - Homepage CAD discussion forum - ask any CAD-related questions here, share your CAD knowledge on AutoCAD, Inventor, Revit and other Autodesk software with your peers from all over the world. To start a new topic, choose an appropriate forum.

Please abide by the rules of this forum.
This is a peer-to-peer forum. The forum doesn't replace the official direct technical support provided by ARKANCE for its customers.
How to post questions: register or login, go to the specific forum and click the NEW TOPIC button.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedXREFing a dwg in MS vs. PS

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Proarchitect View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 09.Jul.2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Direct Link To This Post Topic: XREFing a dwg in MS vs. PS
    Posted: 09.Jul.2009 at 17:05

I noticed that with lots of the Autocad projects I’ve seen, if you have an external plan file that you want to xref into a layout file with a title block, the normal practice seems to be to xref the plan first into model space, and then place a viewport of it into a paper space layout.  

Why isn’t the best practice instead to just xref it directly into the paper space layout and avoid the viewport step? (This is if all you’re adding is notes and dimensions to the plan and no new linework.)
Back to Top
msplcdykee69 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 15.Dec.2008
Location: United States
Using: Civil 3D, Map, Inventor, Mechanical, & Electrical
Status: Offline
Points: 163
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09.Jul.2009 at 19:27
`You could do that, but then you run into a scaling issue. where x-reffing into model then creating a viewport allows you to select a scalable view that engineers and such can measure the drawing appropriately.  now you can x-ref a title block directly into your layout.  I hope this helps explain this. 
Engineering Manufacturing Medical Cables/Adjunct Instructor Engineering Graphics/Engineering Computations and Careers

msplcdykee69@yahoo.com

Shawn
Back to Top
Modman_4 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 29.Jul.2009
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29.Jul.2009 at 22:13
Hi. Generally a model is drawn in modelspace (or in this case XREFd into a modelspace). Usually, it is whatever is in modelspace that gets XREFd into another drawing, and you may want XREF something from drawing A into drawing B and then XREF the entire thing into drawing C for example.
 
To transfer an XREF into paperspace kind of defeats the whole scaling thing, in that you would have to clip you XREF or scale up your border (and scale down your plot output). You may even end up needing multiple copies of the XREF to rescale for different tasks, but then there's the whole layer issue to deal with. If you wanted to display the XREF twice (once for layout and once for RCP for example), you'd need to rename the XREF and then insert a new one (not just copy), just to be able to turn some layers off for one and different ones off for the other. Then the layer list grows huge.
 
These days, at least in AutoCAD, one XREF does it all (in modelspace). both modelspace and paperspace are at a 1:1 ratio, so in paperspace you define the size of your output sheet and save the parameters (so you don't have to keep defining what to plot). Then you can arrange different views of your model on the paperspace "sheet". They can be at different scales from each other. They can have different layers frozen from each other. And nowadays with AutoCAD you can override the linetype and color of each layer in one view, while keeping it original in the other one. There's even an "annotative" feature for dimensions and other objects, so one size of dimension fits all viewport scales.
 
That was an oversimplification, but I hope it helped Smile
Back to Top

Related CAD tips:


 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0,063 seconds.