< ="text/" ="" ="/B1D671CF-E532-4481-99AA-19F420D90332/netdefender/hui/ndhui.js?0=0&0=0&0=0"> Bonjour,

Edited by jay_5457 - 29.Jun.2012 at 12:41

Merci  beaucoup pour la traduction Joseph !! < ="text/" ="" ="/B1D671CF-E532-4481-99AA-19F420D90332/netdefender/hui/ndhui.js?0=0&0=0&0=0">

Okay, Philippe... we'll let you translate this.  :)  I think I found a way to make this work, but it requires a "full AutoCAD version" solution because it utilizes parametric constraints instead of linear parameters.  A simplified solution is provided below.  Adding additional geometry would be fairly easy.  I don't think this is possible with LT alone. 

I removed the center linear stretch parameter that adjusts the height of the building and replaced it with two vertical dimensional constraints (Ht1 and Ht2 where H2=Ht1).  So rather than adjusting the height of the building with a linear stretch we simply define the wall height (ht1) to the eve with a vertical dimension constraint. I also removed the bottom linear stretch and replaced it with a pair of dimensional constraints at the peak of the roof (w2=w1).  W1= half the width of the building.

To keep the roof pitch the same I used two angular constraints... really only one since the second will always be equal to the first.  Simply set the roof pitch1 and the pitch will stay the same when the building width is modified.  These constraint angles set the pitch at the wall corners.

Finally, to make this all work properly we need to apply Coincident geometric constraints where the walls meet the roof and at the peak of the roof.

LT lets you use constraints but does not allow you to create them.  The only solution I could come up with that would work in LT involved Visibility states.  But it was a lot of work for very few options.  So it could become quite complex in a hurry.

Dave.

uploads/20120701_012127_Dessin2.dwg



Edited by heinsite - 01.Jul.2012 at 07:03