CAD Forum - tips, tricks, discussion and utilities for AutoCAD, Inventor, Revit and other Autodesk products [www.cadforum.cz] ARKANCE | CONTACT - CZ | SK | EN | DE
Over 1.095.000 registered users (EN+CZ). AutoCAD tips, Inventor tips, Revit tips. Try the new precise Engineering calculator. New AutoCAD 2026 commands and variables.
RSS channel - CAD tips RSS tips
RSS discussions

Discussion Discussion forum

?
CAD discussions, advices, exchange of experience

CAD Forum - Homepage CAD discussion forum - ask any CAD-related questions here, share your CAD knowledge on AutoCAD, Inventor, Revit and other Autodesk software with your peers from all over the world. To start a new topic, choose an appropriate forum.

Please abide by the rules of this forum.
This is a peer-to-peer forum. The forum doesn't replace the official direct technical support provided by ARKANCE for its customers.
How to post questions: register or login, go to the specific forum and click the NEW TOPIC button.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedAutocad map 2012

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
sudhakarn View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 20.Nov.2012
Location: India
Using: 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 5
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Autocad map 2012
    Posted: 16.Nov.2013 at 12:48
Hi,
 
Vector data traced on image in Autocad map 2005 is not matching in Autocad map 2012. I have checked image properties (coordinates ) in both versiones are same. Please help any one is there any changes in autocad 2012 version or is there any changes in settings.
 
Thanks,
Sudhakar
Back to Top
Novarese View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 31.Jan.2012
Location: Italy
Using: Map2006
Status: Offline
Points: 45
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19.Nov.2013 at 11:24

You'd better check out NOT the image coordinates, sir, but the current CRS in both main drawings (command _ADESETCRDSYS)


Back to Top

Related CAD tips:


 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0,070 seconds.