<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>CAD Forum discussion (EN) : autocad alternative</title>
  <link>https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; CAD Forum discussion (EN) : AutoCAD : autocad alternative]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 03:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:56:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.04</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1846</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[autocad alternative : I am using AutoCAD since 1992....]]></title>
   <link>https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5110&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5110</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/member_profile.asp?PF=1522">LatCh</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1846<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 29.Mar.2009 at 09:56<br /><br />I am using AutoCAD since 1992. Our company has tried IntelliCad twice - first in 2001, returned back to AutoCAD and then in last year. Now we are back again on AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT.<br><br>IntelliCad is almost compatible and its environment is almost the same as in AutoCAD. The main problem was that it crashed quite often and that its DWG files were causing problems by our customers. They were complaining about printing problems, fatal errors, missing data. So our customers pushed us back to AutoCAD.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5110&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5110</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[autocad alternative : in fact, price makes us move....]]></title>
   <link>https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5108&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5108</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/member_profile.asp?PF=43503">dicksham</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1846<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 29.Mar.2009 at 05:19<br /><br />in fact, price makes us move. The prices of these alternatives are a little bit higher than microsoft windows, but&nbsp;lower than microsoft office. How about Microstation? <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>We know Star5 hotels are always better than Star3. But if we just use the room at night and the bed is comfortable enough to make us sleep, why do we need to pay trible. Making money is not easy today, especially this year. If autocad price won't drop, bosses would&nbsp;cut the software costs but keep good employees working.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>"Intellicad is autocad-compatible". Can some professionals/ expert users prove it is wrong? Why don't Autodesk do something to beat them?</DIV><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by dicksham - 29.Mar.2009 at 05:32</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 05:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5108&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5108</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[autocad alternative : I use Civil 3D Autodesk software...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5107&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5107</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/member_profile.asp?PF=30236">msplcdykee69</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1846<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 29.Mar.2009 at 04:36<br /><br />I use Civil 3D Autodesk software and for the company I had tried out diffrent alternatives to Autodesk software and I have found Microstation to be very good and also works great importing dwg's it costs much less and is very similar to Autodesk and it will take some getting use to, but I have to say with everything out there and if my company was to move away from autodesk software this is what i would recommend.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 04:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5107&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5107</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[autocad alternative : Beside the frequent support requests...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5102&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5102</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Vladimir Michl</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1846<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27.Mar.2009 at 16:54<br /><br /><P>Beside the frequent support requests from our customers struggling with "strange things" when working on such DWG files, there is the Budweiser DWG-compatibility benchmark on <a href="http://www.xanadu.cz/budweiser" target="_blank">www.xanadu.cz/budweiser</A>&nbsp;(not yet updated to the current DWG2010 format).</P><DIV>And the incompatibilities are logical - DWG is an Autodesk file format which is not publicly documented so any "compatible" application can use just a reverse-engineered approximation of this format.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5102&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5102</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[autocad alternative : thanks, vladimir,  thanks for...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5101&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5101</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/member_profile.asp?PF=43503">dicksham</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1846<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27.Mar.2009 at 16:42<br /><br />thanks, vladimir,<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>thanks for your comment. but can you share any report to prove that these alternatives are actually not compatible.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>i heard the comments from <a href="http://www.intellicad.net" target="_blank">www.intellicad.net</A>, which are opposite to yours.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5101&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5101</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[autocad alternative : Such AutoCAD &amp;#034;alternatives&amp;#034;...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5097&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5097</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Vladimir Michl</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1846<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27.Mar.2009 at 11:43<br /><br />Such AutoCAD "alternatives" (read "copies") exist for many years. Despite of this, they have never established well on the market. The main reasons are their unreliability and first of all incompatibility with DWG.<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Yes, they do read/write files with the .DWG extension but they do not fully interpret all DWG objects and their <EM>forged</EM> DWG files cause lots of problems when processed in AutoCAD or other CAD applications.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5097&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5097</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[autocad alternative : autocad alternative is just 1/10...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5095&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5095</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/member_profile.asp?PF=43503">dicksham</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1846<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27.Mar.2009 at 02:50<br /><br />autocad alternative is just 1/10 cost of autocad, but with nearly 100% of the functions. 2nd, autocad dwg dominates in building service industry but the economy is not good today; companies need find ways to cut unnecessary costs. ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5095&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5095</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[autocad alternative :    dicksham wrote:personally,...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5089&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5089</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/member_profile.asp?PF=2361">Arben.Allaraj</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1846<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 26.Mar.2009 at 15:46<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><img src="forum_images/quote_box.png" title="Originally posted by dicksham" alt="Originally posted by dicksham" style="vertical-align: text-bottom;" /> <strong>dicksham wrote:</strong><br /><br /><div id="post_message_224845">personally, i haven't used autocad for a long time. currently, my friend asked me to recommend one good autocad alternative to him. <br><br>i think most of the alternative softwares are using the same kernel/technology (intellicad), but just their interfaces are a little bit different. Am i right? is CMS intellicad good to use? it seems to be the cheapest one, much cheaper than Progecad &amp; Bricscad. <br><br>if there is no big difference in technology, should i choose the cheapest one? please advise<br><br>thanks in advance!</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>dickson sham</div></td></tr></table><br><br>For what he will use it.?<br><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5089&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5089</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[autocad alternative : personally, i haven&amp;#039;t used...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5088&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5088</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/member_profile.asp?PF=43503">dicksham</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1846<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 26.Mar.2009 at 13:44<br /><br /><DIV id=post_message_224845>personally, i haven't used autocad for a long time. currently, my friend asked me to recommend one good autocad alternative to him. <BR><BR>i think most of the alternative softwares are using the same kernel/technology (intellicad), but just their interfaces are a little bit different. Am i right? is CMS intellicad good to use? it seems to be the cheapest one, much cheaper than Progecad &amp; Bricscad. <BR><BR>if there is no big difference in technology, should i choose the cheapest one? please advise<BR><BR>thanks in advance!</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>dickson sham</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.cadforum.cz/forum_en/forum_posts.asp?TID=1846&amp;PID=5088&amp;title=autocad-alternative#5088</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>