CAD Forum - tips, tricks, discussion and utilities for AutoCAD, Inventor, Revit and other Autodesk products [www.cadforum.cz] ARKANCE | CONTACT - CZ | SK | EN | DE
RSS channel - CAD tips RSS tips
RSS discussions

Discussion Discussion forum

?
CAD discussions, advices, exchange of experience

CAD Forum - Homepage CAD discussion forum - ask any CAD-related questions here, share your CAD knowledge on AutoCAD, Inventor, Revit and other Autodesk software with your peers from all over the world. To start a new topic, choose an appropriate forum.

Please abide by the rules of this forum.
This is a peer-to-peer forum. The forum doesn't replace the official direct technical support provided by ARKANCE for its customers.
How to post questions: register or login, go to the specific forum and click the NEW TOPIC button.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedData in Vault System

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
glennfuller6 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 16.Jan.2008
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Data in Vault System
    Posted: 19.Mar.2008 at 06:42
The reviews for Riverbed are positive from all sides. The solution they provide looks very promising. In the test trial, we found that it addressed all the issues that we were facing, especially sharing large graphic and design files.

Looking forward to get these products in, in the coming time.
Back to Top
charlesbentt View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 11.Jan.2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14.Mar.2008 at 11:05
I equally versify with what George is sharing for Riverbed’s Steelhead appliances. They are performing well in accelerating VAULT services over slow WANs. They have rattling awful solution.
Back to Top
sdavis_199 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 24.Jan.2008
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10.Mar.2008 at 12:37
There are some unsupported ways to backup the vault using standard enterprise backup tools but you need to be careful as to how you go about this - the biggest concerns are:

 
1) Do not backup the SQL database when it's live
2) And make sure to test your disaster recovery scenarios

Back to Top
rossengary View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 17.Jan.2008
Status: Offline
Points: 5
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05.Mar.2008 at 06:05
We have three offices that are sharing project files and our only solution was Riverbed Steelhead. It's true that they are expensive but the amount of time and headache that is saved is worth every time.
Back to Top
sdavis_199 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 24.Jan.2008
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26.Feb.2008 at 08:38
My preference is to expend time on the front end [creating the backup], rather than on the back end.

Acronis True Image Echo Workstation creates an exact disk image of your office desktop and allows you to backup key data files and folders. You can run backup jobs on multiple machines simultaneously on both 64-bit Windows and 32-bit Windows systems with the centralized remote management capabilities.
Back to Top
rossengary View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 17.Jan.2008
Status: Offline
Points: 5
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19.Feb.2008 at 08:12
Have you tried Riverbed's Steelhead appliance product (www.riverbed.com)? They accelerate VAULT services over slow WANs and make sharing CAD data as fast as it would be on a LAN.
Back to Top
sdavis_199 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 24.Jan.2008
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14.Feb.2008 at 06:41

Are you using 10 / 100 hardware & cabling or gigabit hardware & cabling?

                     

Is the data stored on the computer with the fastest CPU, most ram, and fastest hard disk drives? If not, that could be part of your problem.

 

Have you evaluated the network for load balancing?

 

A router that utilizes SPI (Stateful Packet Inspection), a firewall based protocol, can reduce network efficiency.

Back to Top
rossengary View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 17.Jan.2008
Status: Offline
Points: 5
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05.Feb.2008 at 07:51

Incremental & Differential backups take less time, each day, compared to a total backup, but restoring the files requires A LOT of time.

If you were to mirror, as previously mentioned, or clone or image your HDDs, you would have everything backed up, & you could recover in 1 swell foop.

Back to Top
glennfuller6 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 16.Jan.2008
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30.Jan.2008 at 07:51
Actually we need to implement an incremental or a differential backup procedure. And that too in multiple locations.

It sounds like something might not be configured quite right. Since one of my partners had recently copied ~200GB to a fresh (empty) usb drive and it didn't take anywhere near as long. I was surprised to hear that. Now, I am trying to re-configure.
Back to Top
rossengary View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 17.Jan.2008
Status: Offline
Points: 5
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28.Jan.2008 at 08:37
What are you using to perform the backups? What is your total backup window? Is this all going to be in one location or in multiple locations as far as different servers?
Back to Top

Related CAD tips:


 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0,184 seconds.